☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

  • 16.4K Posts
  • 13.1K Comments
Joined 6 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 30th, 2020

help-circle






  • I think the difference comes down to the material conditions. The US is largely a financialized economy, so the niches for automation are largely in the bullshit economy. In China, there is a huge industrial base and as a result there are a lot of opportunities for AI integration within factories, supply chains, and so on.

    It’s also worth noting that AI is a very general term. The hype bubble is around LLMs which is what I was discussing in the article, but this is just one branch of research. They’re great for making chat bots, but you need different types of AI, like symbolic logic engines, for robotics. So, I imagine the AI industry in China is a lot more diversified because automation is being applied in a far broader context. The focus there isn’t just on making chatbots. I wrote an article about that earlier here incidentally.

    In my opinion, really interesting AI developments are happening precisely in the area of robotics. Training through embodiment and constructing an internal world model makes it possible to do genuine reasoning about how objects behave in the physical world. We have a continuous feedback loop where we take an action, and see the result. That’s our shared context we lean on when communicating with each other. This context is key for being able to explain why you made a particular decision, and allows for error correction and guidance towards better decisions through conversation. This is largely what we mean by having understanding in a human sense. So, what China is doing with robotics is leading to AI systems that can take over jobs that produce use-value as their output.

    How that develops will be interesting to watch because then we’ll have a real test of socialism in China. If China is genuinely socialist then we should expect mass automation of physical labor to start translating into people having more free time and doing less work overall.
























  • I expect the EU will implode within half a decade tops. The whole scheme could only work in times of plenty where financial surplus could paper over the internal tensions. Now that the pie is shrinking, countries which are in a better economic position are pulling up their ladders. We see nationalist parties becoming prominent all over Europe now, and that trend will only accelerate. The EU trying to enforce bloc discipline with financial punishments, like they’re doing with Hungary, is another factor. At some point, Hungary might just decide they’re better off leaving the EU and joining BRICS. If either Germany or France end up with a nationalist government like AfD or NR, then there’s a good chance of them bailing on EU as well. Without France or Germany the whole thing would collapse overnight.






  • My cynical read on this is that the US did not want to see the EU become and independent bloc, or worse start aligning with the east. So, burning it down is in US interest. Meanwhile, now that Russia emerged as a serious power on the continent, the US is willing cut a deal to carve up Ukraine with them in hopes of pulling Russia away from China somewhat. The Europeans will get thrown under the bus, while Russia and the US will likely make some development deals in Ukraine. The fact that Dmitriev, who heads RDIF, has been in a lot of the meetings is a dead give away of where things are headed.