No capital letters, only a comma as punctuation, the last sentence is technically just a fragment. It’s beautiful

Poetic. This would be tagline material if there were anything about leftists in it hahaha

“alive”.

Jk good job ignoring grammar. I believe you, you have been deemed not AI for this comment. Until AI reliably does shitty grammar in a totally human way, I will believe this

You forgot the ‘a’

I’m just going to let it go and assume everything is AI unless it is proven otherwise. So if you want me to believe anything you do is real, you gotta fuck it up a bit how an AI will never do. Use a sentence structure unheard of til now or something lol

Well, I guess, to be fair, Christians do believe that men are made of dirt and women of ribs, so that’s consistent at least

I get the feeling that this can somehow be interpreted as a lesbian tale in disguise through history… But I can’t figure out how.

If someone has tons of tattoos and a couple of runes, I’ll guess they’re aesthetic until some other indication arises. If it’s mostly just runes (even if it’s like their only one), I’ve had like a 90% success rate in assuming they’re horrible. But to be fair, like 70% of everyone in every place I’ve lived was a POS lol

Since 2017? I didn’t spend too much time on him then, I put him in that “Kate Raworth” bucket of left-libs with ecological focus back then because I found little that seemed anything left of social democrat. But I admit I didn’t search too hard. But the past 5 years has been him saying socialist things more and more openly, or at least reaching me and my internet diet.

Very much agreed! I remember reading some papers a while ago (I think like 2017?) and wondering when he would become clearer about class and political struggles and am so glad for the direction he’s been taking recently.

Angola’s is definitely my favorite. WPK is indeed the next best, but Angola’s is just so cool

Definitely top 5 best, most applicable piece of theory of the past 10 years, if you ask me. Short, to the point, powerful, Marxist critique is hard to find

Well that 1% is my whole world

(Meaning our beautiful man of steel)

Damn, Roderic and Nia had a pulse on the most important, recurring topics of our time really well. Every time I see a post of Redsails, it’s genuinely as relevant and perfectly touching the point as the best of them have done.

Squirt it back at Earth, easy. It’ll cool off high in the atmosphere so then it won’t even warm the earth and will not impact climate change

Oh fuck now I definitely fo hatr him for that too

Damn u got me good, I’m happy that STEM, though a limiting and weird incestuous set of approaches, at least doesn’t include fuckin lib econ. I was pissed thinking about it

Wow that’s not engineering? Christ lib brainworms are more powerful than I thought

Cesaire was the one who first articulated this effect in the way we think of it today, calling it a terrific boomerang. Then others repeated it, then Foucault regurgitated it as an analysis or Pure Power (instead of the material analysis of Cesaire) but Foucault gets to have people think he made it up. We gotta respect Cesaire, call it his boomerang or just the Imperial boomerang if we want to avoid obscurity.

I don’t really care that much about the term tbh, but I personally despise Foucault for being anti-marxist and taking many older ideas but being french so it got popular

Yeah we should likely be reading the slop as ‘non-rich people should focus on saving their money to be rich instead of caring for an animal with their money which they do have’. It’s the conservative argument usually made.