Damarcusart [he/him, comrade/them]

I’m back! In Hexbear form!

  • 11 Posts
  • 6.22K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: April 18th, 2025

help-circle














  • It’s not clear, I know. But the subject of the sentence comes last, and descriptors appear before that. So the subject of the sentence is the “tanker” and then the descriptor of it is “Iranian sanctioned” which means “sanctioned by Iran” but English doesn’t construct sentences that way, because it would make too much sense. So instead while it means “Tanker that has been sanctioned by Iran” the sentence is vague enough that it could be misinterpreted as “Iranian, Sanctioned, Tanker”

    It’s kind of hard to explain properly because it doesn’t make much sense, but English will prioritise some descriptors over others, so the “condition” of the subject of the sentence comes first, followed by where it comes from. So being sanctioned is a condition of an subject, while Iran is a potential place of origin for it.

    This tanker is “sanctioned” so that comes first as it is a condition, but it isn’t Iranian, otherwise it would be labelled as a “Sanctioned Iranian Tanker” Since the place of origin or ownership comes later in a description than the condition of the subject.

    So “Iranian Sanctioned” is a full descriptor of the condition of the tanker, rather than being two separate descriptors for “Iranian” and “Sanctioned” because if that were the case, it would be phrased as “Sanctioned Iranian Tanker.”

    Makes sense? No? Don’t worry, English has frustrating rules like this that aren’t really taught properly to English learners, since native speakers just kind of pick it up inherently and never really think about it, which can lead to a lot of confusion.