• BCsven@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    From my understanding you are required to use a specific international standard radio channel and be listening for distress callls while on the water.

    So if they were on the wrong channel that seems like a fineable offense.

    • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      It wasn’t a distress call. It was a call for non-emergency assistance. Like the difference between calling for a tow truck and calling for an ambulance. It wasn’t on the emergency frequency. The story is a nothingburger.

        • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          According to the U.S. Coast Guard and the Marine Exchange of Alaska, which monitors ship traffic in Alaska, there was no distress call — just a general request for assistance.

          Coast Guard Public Affairs Specialist Shannon Shepard said by email that the Coast Guard heard the call for help just after 9:30 p.m. Monday night.

          “At approximately 9:56 p.m., the Coast Guard determined they were not in distress and issued a marine assistance request broadcast on their behalf,” she said.

          Alaska Beacon

          Article also points out that as a frequent visitor to the area, the cruise ship would be more familiar with the frequencies used locally.